Trump's Narcissism: Merkel's Crowds Compared to Hitler In his usual self-aggrandizing fashion, former President Donald Trump bragged about a supposed compliment he received from the German Chancellor, Angela Merkel. According to a new book, Trump claimed that Merkel had remarked that "only one other political leader" drew bigger crowds than him. However, it appears that Trump might have been oblivious to the subtle comparison Merkel was making to Adolf Hitler. The revelation comes from the book "Peril" by Bob Woodward and Robert Costa, which provides an inside look into the final days of the Trump administration. One chapter focuses on Trump's obsession with crowd sizes and his habit of bragging about them. The authors reveal that Trump frequently brought up his crowd sizes during conversations with advisers and even during his calls with world leaders. During a phone call with Merkel, Trump allegedly boasted about the massive crowd sizes at his political rallies. In response, Merkel casually remarked that there was only one other political leader she knew who attracted such large crowds. Trump, seemingly unaware of the deeper meaning behind her words, interpreted it as a compliment. It is worth noting that Hitler was infamous for his ability to draw enormous crowds during his rise to power in Germany. By comparing Trump's crowd sizes to Hitler's, Merkel seemed to be subtly suggesting a dangerous parallel between the two leaders. However, Trump, known for his lack of historical knowledge, failed to grasp the implications of Merkel's comment. This incident serves as yet another example of Trump's narcissism and his constant need for validation. His obsession with crowd sizes was evident throughout his presidency, whether it was boasting about his inauguration crowd being the biggest ever or exaggerating the attendance at his rallies. Trump seemed to believe that the size of his crowds was a measure of his success and popularity. The comparison to Hitler, even in a subtle form, is troubling and raises questions about Trump's understanding of history and the dangers of authoritarianism. While Merkel's comment may have been intended as a cautionary tale, it is clear that Trump lacked the self-awareness to recognize it as such. This episode also highlights the challenges faced by world leaders in their interactions with Trump. Throughout his tenure, Trump often employed bombastic and unconventional tactics in his diplomacy. Whether it was his infamous phone call with the Ukrainian President or his contentious relationship with leaders like Merkel, Trump's approach to international relations was unpredictable and often left his counterparts perplexed. Merkel, known for her measured and pragmatic approach to politics, had to navigate this difficult terrain. While it is unclear whether she intentionally made the comparison to Hitler or if it was a passing remark, it is evident that she was trying to convey a message to Trump about the dangers of using crowd sizes as a measure of success. The revelation about Merkel's comment adds another layer to the complex relationship between the two leaders. Throughout his presidency, Trump often criticized Merkel and clashed with her on issues such as trade and immigration. On his part, Trump saw Merkel as a symbol of globalism and criticized her handling of issues such as refugees. The dynamics between the two leaders were further strained by Trump's disdain for multilateral institutions, which Merkel favored. Trump's boast about Merkel's supposed compliment not only reveals his narcissism but also his lack of critical thinking and historical awareness. His inability to grasp the implications of Merkel's comment highlights a fundamental flaw in his leadership style. Leadership requires more than just attracting large crowds; it demands introspection, empathy, and a deep understanding of history. The incident also serves as a reminder of the importance of critical thinking and historical literacy in our political leaders. Ignoring the warning signs and dismissing comparisons to historical figures like Hitler can have dire consequences. Merkel's subtle comparison was a cautionary tale, a reminder of the dangers of demagoguery and the role of the masses in enabling authoritarian leaders. As we reflect on the Trump era, it is crucial to learn from the mistakes and shortcomings of his presidency. Merkel's comment serves as a reminder to be vigilant and not to dismiss the red flags that can signal a dangerous path. In a democracy, it is the responsibility of the citizens to hold their leaders accountable and to be wary of leaders who prioritize their own ego over the well-being of the nation. The revelation about Trump's misinterpretation of Merkel's comment shines a light on the superficiality and shallowness of his leadership style. It is a stark reminder of the dangers of narcissism in politics and the need for leaders who are capable of self-reflection and humility. In the end, the incident serves as another chapter in the book of Trump's presidency, a testament to his self-absorption and his inability to understand the deeper implications of his actions and words. It is a cautionary tale for future leaders and a reminder of the importance of historical awareness and critical thinking in our political discourse.
top of page
bottom of page